Social Interaction Terms

 By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: Foto Akhmad Zamroni

Not all meetings between individuals or between groups are called interactions. A meeting, contact, or relationship between two parties that meet certain conditions is classified as an interaction. This shows, social interaction requires a number of certain requirements.

Social interaction will not occur if two conditions are not met. According to Soerjono Soekanto (2005: 64), two conditions for the occurrence of social interaction are social contact and communication. These two conditions will be discussed in more detail.

A.   Social Contact

What is social contact? What kind of event is classified as social contact? What are the characteristics of social contact? What and what social contacts have you had or frequently had?

The word contact comes from the Latin con or cum and tango. The word con or cum means 'together', while tango means 'to touch'. Thus, literally, contact means "touching together".

Physically, contact will occur if there is physical or physical connection. However, as a social phenomenon, contact does not have to and does not necessarily mean 'physical contact', such as shaking hands, holding hands, hugging, hugging, wrestling, fighting, or fist fights. In the context of social interaction, contact can also mean making relationships in the form of "not physically touching". Activities without physical contact, such as chatting on the phone and exchanging ideas via cellphone short messages (SMS), can also include contact. In fact, according to Kingsley Davis (in Soekanto, 2005: 65), physical touch does not need to be the main condition for contact.

Thus, social contact can occur with or without physical contact. Social contact in the form of physical relationships, for example, two people who meet greet each other and shake hands. Social contact in the form of no physical connection, for example, two people communicate by mail via post or electronic mail (e-mail) on the internet.

Based on the perpetrator, social contact can be divided into contact between individuals, contact between individuals and groups, and contact between groups.

1.   An example of social contact between individuals is a vocational school student talking to one of his teachers.

2.   An example of social contact between individuals and groups is a company director speaking on the pulpit to provide work motivation to his subordinate employees.

3.   An example of social contact between groups is a book publishing company giving a book printing job order to a printing company.

As for social contact itself has several characteristics. Social contact can be positive and negative, it can also be primary and secondary. The following is a further explanation of the four characteristics in question.

1.   Social contact is positive when it results in cooperation (cooperation). For example, OSIS from two high schools held joint social service activities in areas stricken by natural disasters.

2.   Social contact is negative when it results in conflict. For example, a number of workers in a garment company went on strike and complained against the directors of the company where they worked with the Ministry of Manpower due to the low monthly wages they received and the arbitrariness and inhumanity of the board of directors in imposing working hours.

3.  Social contact is primary if in making contact, the perpetrators meet face to face. For example, a speaker makes a presentation and questions and answers in front of an audience at a seminar.

4.   Social contact is secondary if in making contact, the perpetrators use certain intermediaries. For example, a bank director exchanges ideas with one of his managers over the phone to improve service to customers.

From the following understanding, the examples of contact presented are clear that social contact is a condition for social interaction. Without contact, social interaction will not occur. If a relationship between two individuals or two groups is not characterized by reciprocal actions that influence each other - in the sense that there is no contact - then the relationship does not lead to or does not include social interaction.

B.   Communication

In terms of language, communication means sending and receiving messages between two or more people so that the message in question can be understood (Big Indonesian Dictionary, 2002: 585). As for sociologically, communication is defined as the process of delivering messages, ideas, or desires from one party to another to form a common understanding (Purwito, 2005: 56). The substance of communication, both semantically and linguistically as well as sociologically, is the delivery or delivery of messages between two parties which causes them to obtain relatively the same understanding of something.

In simple terms, communication can also be defined as a relationship or relationship. In communication, there are five defining elements, namely communicators, communicants, messages, media, and effects. The explanation of the five is as follows.

1.   Communicator is a person or group of people who convey or transmit messages, feelings, opinions, ideas, or thoughts to other people or groups.

2.   A communicant is a person or group of people who receive messages, feelings, opinions, or thoughts from other parties.

3.   Message is something or something conveyed by the communicator. Messages can be in the form of data, information, instructions, thoughts, feelings, and ideas.

4.   Media is a means or tool used to convey messages. Communication media can be in the form of spoken, written, pictures, newspapers, telephone, and so on.

5.   Effects are changes that occur to the communicant after receiving a message from the communicator.

Communication is a prerequisite for social interaction because communication greatly determines the emergence of relationships between individuals and individuals, between individuals and groups, or between groups and groups in community life. Communication allows the delivery and reception of messages so that conversation, dialogue, discussion, exchange of information, exchange of ideas, and so on occurs. From here emerge various reciprocal relationships between two or several parties in various forms.

Communication is a complementary contact for social interactions. Without communication, contact will not lead to social interaction. Two people can make contact, but if they both do not complete it with communication, they can be said to have not interacted. For example, an Indonesian woman meets and shakes hands with a Japanese woman, then the Indonesian woman greets and speaks in Indonesian, even though the Japanese woman doesn't understand Indonesian at all so she doesn't understand messages (feelings, thoughts, or information) delivered by the Indonesian woman. In this example, contact (as the first condition for interaction) has occurred, but because one of the parties does not understand the other's conversation, no communication takes place and thus social interaction does not occur.

From these descriptions and examples, it can be seen that communication plays a crucial role in social interaction. With communication, the feelings, thoughts, desires, attitudes, or ideas of a person or group can be known by other people or groups. This then becomes the material to determine the reactions, responses, or actions that will and need to be done to provide a response.

As a determinant of social interaction, communication can take place in various forms or models. At least, there are four communication models that usually occur in social interactions. The four forms or models of communication are unidirectional communication, two-way communication, direct communication, and indirect communication.

1.   One-way or one-way communication is communication that takes place only from the communicator to the communicant; in a sense, the active communicator fully holds the conversation, while the communicant only passively accepts (listens) without giving feedback. For example, a kiai gives a sermon in front of a number of Muslims in a Friday prayer assembly or a state official addresses the people on television.

2.   Two-way communication is communication in which both the communicator and the communicant are active and give and respond to messages. For example, price bargaining between a seller and a buyer at a traditional market or a dialogue between a resource person and a farmer in a face-to-face activity to discuss the issue of high fertilizer prices.

3.  Direct communication is communication in which the communicator and the communicant communicate directly, either face to face or face to face (face to face) or at a distance using communication tools or media (telephone, hanphone, teleconference, HT, internet , etc). For example, two students talk to discuss plans to carry out an assignment given by a lecturer or a retailer who orders goods to a wholesaler by telephone.

4.   Indirect communication is communication in which the delivery and reception of messages and responses to messages by communicators and communicants is carried out through third party intermediaries. For example, a dispute between the board of directors of a company and employees / laborers is resolved through a dialogue initiated and brokered by the Ministry of Manpower or two teenagers greeting each other through another teenager as a third party.

Definition and Characteristics of Social Interaction

By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: Foto Akhmad Zamroni

In daily routine life, actual interaction is not something foreign to most of us. This word is often used in various occasions. However, the interactions that we are discussing or studying have a specific meaning. Before explaining the meaning of social interaction, consider the following two examples.

One day a new student of a vocational high school named Raka on the first day of school meets another new student named Hari. When they met, the two became acquainted by shaking hands, asking each other for addresses, and exchanging cellphone numbers. The next day, they were involved in various discussions about lessons and school activities that they would attend. In the following days, they became closer to each other until they became close friends who often did activities together, such as doing teacher assignments, doing lab work, participating in extracurricular activities, being active in sports clubs, and watching art performances.

Meanwhile, in another place, due to her brilliant work performance, Bu Yanti was appointed to be the manager of the production division of a company. As a new manager, Bu Yanti routinely gives assignments and instructions to her subordinates, while her subordinates also periodically provide reports on their work to Ms. Yanti. Bu Yanti herself once a week participates in routine meetings with the company's management and reports to the general manager.

From these two examples, can you formulate a definition of the meaning of 'interaction'? Which of the occurrences in the two examples is actually called 'interaction'? Is each person's action an "interaction"?

If you pay close attention to the actions that Raka, Hari, and Bu Yanti did, you will get a clearer picture of the interactions. And indeed, the actions of Raka, Hari, and Bu Yanti in that example are actions called interactions. Raka's and Hari's introduction until the two of them become friends is an interaction. Likewise, the actions taken by Bu Yanti and her subordinates and superiors were also interactions.

Then, what is a concrete understanding of the interaction itself? From these examples, it can be formulated that interaction is a reciprocal relationship that affects each other that occurs between one individual and another, between one group and another, or between individuals and groups. In the two examples above, it can be seen that the actors carry out a reciprocal relationship that affects each other. Raka and Hari met each other, exchanged addresses, talked, and did many activities together. As for Bu Yanti, routinely gave assignments and instructions, while her subordinates carried them out and gave reports to her.

Etymologically, interaction comes from the word inter- and action. Inter- means "reciprocating", whereas action means "action" or "action". Thus, interaction means an action or deed that is performed or occurs between two parties reciprocally.

Kimball Young and Raymond W. Mack (in Soekanto, 2005: 61) say that interactions are dynamic social relationships involving relationships between individuals, between individuals and groups, or between groups. When two people meet, social interaction begins. Interaction is characterized by meeting each other, greeting each other, shaking hands, talking to each other, and working together.

Relationships called interactions do not always and do not have to end in a positive light. Two people or two groups that meet, get acquainted, talk, exchange information, and then even mutilate because of a misunderstanding can be classified as an interaction. This shows that interactions can be both positive and negative.

Even according to Soerjono Soekanto (2005: 61), if two people or two groups meet, but do not greet each other or exchange signs, social interaction has occurred. It is still an interaction if each party is aware of the other party causing changes in their feelings or nerves caused by the smell of sweat, scent of perfume, the sound of footsteps, and so on. All of this creates an impression on their minds which then determines the form of action to be carried out next.

Social interaction is a general form of social process because social interaction is the main condition for the occurrence of various social activities. Social activity can only take place when in community life, both between individuals and between groups, there is interaction. According to Kimball Young and Raymond W. Mack (1959: 137), social interaction is the key to all social life because, without social interaction, there will be no life together.

The meeting of individuals or groups physically alone will not result in the association of life in society. The social life in question will only occur when individuals and / or groups meet, talk, cooperate, compete, fight, and so on. Therefore, it can be said, social interaction is the basis of social processes.

From the definition of interaction that has been stated above, you can of course mention the characteristics of social interactions or, at least, you can identify the characteristics of social interactions. According to your analysis, what are the characteristics of this social interaction? Related to what are the characteristics referred to?

From some of the examples and definitions of social interactions that have been discussed, we can find some characteristics or characteristics of social interactions. These characteristics, among others, are as follows:

a.   involving more than one party (either individually or as a group);

b. there is awareness of the other party's presence;

c.   the relationship that occurs is reciprocal;

d. there is action (action) and reaction (response);

e.   there is a change in feeling or attitude;

f.   there is a desire or initiative to take further action; and

g. often followed by actions in the form of cooperation, friendship, competition, or perhaps conflict (disputes, quarrels, fights, and the like).

Meanwhile, Charles P. Loomis (in Purwito, 2007: 53) argues that social interaction has four main characteristics. The four characteristics are as follows.

a.   The number of perpetrators is more than one person.

b. Communication between actors takes place in two directions.

c.   There are dimensions of past, present, and future time.

d. There are certain goals to be achieved.

Humans as Social Beings

By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: Foto Akhmad Zamroni

Have you been constantly living alone in order to provide for all the many and varied necessities of your life? Is it true that you can live a normal life without the presence of other people? To your knowledge, is there a human being who is able to live and exist continuously in total solitude, completely without contact with others? Of course 'no', right?

Even in the smallest environment, namely family, it will be clear that you, as well as other people, always live with the help of others. In the family environment, to pay for school and daily living, you still need help from your parents. To study at school and hang out in the village, you also need the help of teachers and the presence of friends and community members around you. Your friends and others who are much older and more economically established will still need the presence and help of others.

The difficulty in escaping from the presence and help of others shows that you and everyone else around you are social creatures. As a social being, you need other people, and vice versa, other people need you too. Several characteristics can then be recognized related to human existence as social beings, among others, that humans: (a) cannot live alone, (b) need the presence and assistance of others, and (c) need to make contact /contact and cooperation with each other.

As social beings, humans have an instinct called gregariousness, which is the instinct to always live in groups or together. In humans, the instinct for gregariousness appears to be a natural nature that cannot be eliminated. According to Elwood (in Purwito, 2007: 52–53), the instinct of gregariousness arises because of the impulse or necessity of life that needs fulfillment, which are more detailed, including the urge to meet the needs of eating and drinking, to defend oneself from threats and dangers. as well as to channel biological needs and obtain offspring. These three impulses or needs can then be explained as follows.

a.  To fulfill their food and drinking needs, humans must cooperate with other humans in various forms, such as buying and selling, contracts, and working.

b.  In order to defend themselves from threats and dangers, humans must have self-defense by forming cohesiveness and collectivity with others.

c.  To channel biological needs (especially sexual desire) and get offspring, humans need a partner (opposite sex) to marry (marriage).

Meanwhile, human needs themselves, in fact, do not only include the three things above. When human life has entered the modern era, as it is today, human needs are very complex and are often difficult to list in detail. To fulfill all or most of these needs, humans clearly need the presence of other humans. The presence of humans or other people is needed to establish cooperation (in the social, cultural, economic, and so on), form groups (associations, organizations, political parties, ethnicities, nations, states, etc.), and create a defense and security system (military and so on).

 

Interaction as a Social Process

 By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: Foto Akhmad Zamroni

Everywhere, every day, people are preoccupied with various matters that require them to relate to each other. At home, parents advise their children to study hard or ask their parents for money to buy books. At the shop, while enjoying breakfast and hot coffee, people discuss the government's plan to increase the price of BBM (fuel oil). In the market, both sellers and buyers are involved in haggling over prices. In school the teacher assigns the students the task of having a discussion. In the company, managers exchange ideas to find a formula to increase work productivity. At the government office the head of the department instructs his subordinates to increase discipline. On the highway the police give signs to road users so that traffic will run smoothly. On the green field two soccer teams compete to score goals and beat each other. At the UN headquarters diplomats from all over the world are busy looking for solutions to create international peace.

That's human life, from then until now. As long as they still hold the title of social being, humans will always have a relationship or contact with each other. Normal humans cannot and cannot live alone. To maintain and preserve their existence as well as to continue life, humans will always communicate, mingle, and cooperate with each other.

As a part of society, you are certainly familiar with or, at least, able to witness, feel, and perceive the phenomenon. For every member of society (especially adults), this phenomenon of social life must be familiar. Communicating, socializing, or cooperating with others at various levels –– from the simplest to the most complex –– in fact it is done by every member of society, including those who are still classified as children.

The impossibility of humans to live fully alone and their difficulty not to have contact with others clearly show that humans cannot escape from their basic nature as social beings and find it difficult to avoid a phenomenon called interaction. Interaction will always accompany the movement of the life of social creatures called humans. Then, what is actually called interaction? How is the relationship between interaction and human life as social beings? What are the conditions for the interaction to occur? What and how are the forms of interaction common in human life?

As living beings, humans have a position that can be said to be "special" or "distinctive" compared to other living things on this earth. Because of certain traits or characteristics they have, humans are commonly referred to as social creatures. So, the position of man as a social being needs to be discussed first before we are more specific in discussing and exploring the problems of interaction and social processes of human life. The discussion of humans as social beings will greatly help us in understanding the various problems surrounding interactions in human life.

Nelson Mandela, Opponent and Remover of Apartheid

 By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: The New York Times

Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was born in Mvezo, South Africa, on July 18, 1918. His childhood was spent in Thembu. His father, Henry Mandela, was the chief of the Thembu tribe. Mandela died in Johannesburg, South Africa, on December 5, 2013 at the age of 95.

Mandela was the first person in his family to attend school. Related to this, Mandela stated, “Neither in my family has ever attended school…. On the first day of school, my teacher, Miss Mdingane, gave each student an English name. This was the custom of the African people at that time and certainly due to the British influence on our education. That day, Miss Mdingane told me that my new name was Nelson. I don't know why he chose that name. "

At the age of 16, Mandela entered the Clarkebury Boarding Institute to study Western culture. In 1934, he studied law at Fort Hare University. After moving to Johannesburg, he attended the University of South Africa. After completing his studies in 1942, he returned to study law at the University of Witwatersrand.

During his life, Mandela underwent three marriages. First, he married Evelyn Ntoko Mase; and after surviving for 13 years, divorced in 1957. His second marriage, to Winnie Mandikizela, which lasted 38 years, also ended in divorce (1996). On his 80th birthday (1998), Mandela married Graca Machel, the widow of former President of Mozambique, Samora Machel.

A.  Actively Opposing Apartheid

Since he was young, Mandela was known as a critical person. He is sensitive to all forms of injustice. In 1940, while studying at Fort Hare University, he had already staged a demonstration against university policies which he considered unfair so he was expelled from campus.

Entering his 20s, Mandela became active in social and political movements. He joined the African National Congress (ANC), a multiracial nationalist movement organization whose mission is to change the social and political conditions in South Africa. He also co-founded the ANC Youth League (1944).

Mandela began to fight as the social and political temperature in South Africa escalated in the late 1940s. He got the motivation and enthusiasm to fight back when the white South African government regime imposed apartheid politics in 1948. White community groups that almost completely dominated the South African government, through apartheid claimed to be the superior group that should receive special treatment and exclude people of color. –– especially blacks –– as a lowly group whose rights do not need attention.

Since apartheid was imposed by the white regime, people of color - especially blacks who make up the majority in South Africa - live in oppression and are overshadowed by violence. Apartheid policy caused the rights of people of color as human beings and citizens to not be implemented properly. They, among others, were prohibited from exercising their right to vote, were prohibited from living in white communities, and were denied access to higher education and to obtain decent work.

Apartheid, which caused inequality, injustice and oppression, whipped up Mandela to increase the militancy of his movement. After being appointed as one of the ANC's deputy chairmen (in 1952), he worked hard to change ANC policies to become more militant. This led to him being accused of being a traitor, but later found not guilty (1959).

B.  Sentenced to Life Sentence

The white government regime apparatus carried out the massacre of the demonstrators in Sharpeville (1960). This massacre caused 69 black people to die. The brutality and cruelty of this white government regime fueled Mandela's determination and courage to fight against apartheid.

Mandela began to be confrontational with the white regime. About a year after the atrocities at Sharpeville, he initiated the formation of the Umkhonto we Sizwe (1961), a resistance army under the ANC. Umkhonto we Sizwe was prepared for physical and armed resistance against the white regime.

To improve his military and combat capabilities, Mandela attended military training in Algeria. In 1962 he returned to his homeland to continue his confrontational resistance to white rule. However, shortly after arriving in South Africa, Mandela was arrested and tried by the white government regime. He was sentenced to five years in prison on suspicion of leaving South Africa illegally.

Before his sentence ended, Mandela was again brought to court with his colleagues. In 1964, Mandela was convicted by a non-independent white regime trial and sentenced to life in prison. He was accused of sabotage and conspiring to overthrow the government.

C.  Reconciliation

Despite his imprisonment, Mandela's enthusiasm and determination to fight apartheid did not diminish. From behind bars, he did not stop stirring up the spirit of resistance to apartheid. His comrades in arms and followers outside the prison took up resistance efforts through various means. The international community also supported Mandela.

Mandela's extraordinary resistance with the black South African community and continuous international pressure finally made the white government regime surrender. The President of South Africa, F.W. de Klerk, on 11 February 1990 ordered Mandela's unconditional release. Apartheid policy was declared to be lifted from South Africa, along with the preparation for holding general elections. Through the elections held in 1994, Mandela was declared the winner and elected president of South Africa. He became the first black president in South African history.

After successfully eliminating apartheid and becoming the number one person in South Africa, Mandela embraced all components of the South African nation to carry out reconciliation (national reconciliation), promote unity, and jointly rebuild South Africa. For his great and outstanding services, Mandela has been named a phenomenal figure by the international community. In 1993, Mandela with F.W. de Klerk was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his major contributions to the abolition of apartheid and peacemaking in South Africa.

Indonesian Legal System

 By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: http://klikkabar.com

What is a system? What are the so-called legal systems and judicial systems? How is the relationship between the legal system and the judicial system? What is the legal system and judicial system in effect in Indonesia?

As a rule of law, Indonesia creates and implements a legal system in all regions of the country. The legal system constitutes the whole elements of national law which are interrelated and mutually supportive, which are designed to create order, security and justice. The national legal system is also directed at realizing a prosperous, dignified and civilized life in society, nation and state.

A.  Definition of the Legal System

A system is a set of elements that are regularly interrelated to form a unity or totality. The system can also be interpreted as an orderly arrangement of views, theories, principles, rules, and so on (Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, 2002: 1076). The main factors of the system are “bonding” and “mutual influence”. The elements of mutual influence mean that in the system there are elements that run continuously and flexibly (Zamroni and Lukmono, 2011: 260).

The system is a totality whose parts are interconnected. Goal-oriented systems; a system interacts with a larger system, namely its environment; the working of the parts of a system creates something of value; and each part must be in accordance with one another and there is a unifying force that binds it (Rahardjo in Effendi, 2013: 2). The system can also be interpreted as an integrated whole complex, which is characterized by interacting elements that are directed at achieving certain goals (Nisjar and Winardi in Effendi, 2013: 2).

Thus, the legal system can be defined as a set of rules or regulations and their supporting components which are arranged or formed regularly in a unit that is interconnected and influences each other. The legal system does not only consist of a collection of rules or regulations, but also other complementary components that make the set of rules work properly. The set of rules and complementary components each have a position and a role, but as a series they form a totality that is able to provide a compact and collective function.

The legal system can be said to be a complex entity. Its complexity can be seen not only from its function as a regulator of individual behavior, but also as a regulator of life in society, nation and state. All countries and nations have legal systems with different forms and characteristics. In a country that claims to be a rule of law, national law - as a norm - is placed as the highest system, which overcomes all rules, traditions, and various regulations of organizations and groups. As the elaboration of the constitution and the basis of the state, national law becomes a reference in the life of the community, nation and state. As a regulator of individual and community behavior in the life of society, nation and state, the legal system has high complexity and dynamics.

B.  Legal System in Indonesia

In principle, the legal system is a formal structure. In the Indonesian context, the legal system in question is a positive legal system, namely the legal system (currently) in effect in Indonesia. The Indonesian legal system is based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. As the basis of the state, Pancasila is the source of norms, values ​​and rules for all laws and regulations in Indonesia. Apart from referring to Pancasila values, all laws and regulations must also be based on the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) as the state constitution. Legislation is a further and more detailed description of the 1945 Constitution.

Our national legal system functions to enforce law and justice through various mechanisms. In general, these mechanisms include, among other things, regulating the order of laws and regulations, regulating the structure (structure) of legal institutions, regulating legal material, and cultivating a law-abiding culture.

1.  Order of the Prevailing Laws

Our country applies various laws and regulations to regulate the life of society, nation and state. These regulations contain provisions on various issues, such as defense and security, human rights, taxation, education, employment, land, agriculture, business competition, press and broadcasting. The prevailing laws and regulations have different positions because the institutions that made them and the scope of their application also differ.

Thus, the prevailing laws and regulations have different levels. In other words, statutory regulations are arranged in sequence.

orderly order from highest to lowest. Therefore, in our national statutory regulation system, there is a term known as an order of legislation. The order of the statutory regulations is a level or leveling of the types of laws and regulations based on the principle that lower regulations must not conflict with higher regulations. This applies in order from lowest to highest. To regulate and determine the order of laws and regulations in Indonesia, a separate law is made, namely Law no. 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislative Regulations. According to this law, the types and order of laws and regulations in Indonesia are as follows.

1. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD Negara RI 1945),

2. the decisions of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR Tap),

3. laws (UU) / government regulations in lieu of laws (perppu),

4. government regulations (PP),

5. presidential regulations (perpres),

6. provincial regulations (perda), and

7. District / city regional regulations (perda).

Based on the above sequence, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD Negara RI 1945) has the highest position. Meanwhile, district / city regional regulations (perda) have the lowest position. Meanwhile, the making of all these laws and regulations - including the making or amending of the constitution - must be based on Pancasila. As stated in Article 2 of Law no. 12 of 2011, Pancasila is the source of all sources of state law ..

a.  The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945)

The 1945 Constitution is the basic law or the state constitution which is the source of all statutory regulations in Indonesia. MPR decrees, laws (UU), government regulations in lieu of laws (perpu), government regulations (PP), presidential regulations (perpres), and regional regulations (perda) must be made based on the provisions of the 1945 Constitution. in all these laws and regulations, it must not conflict with the provisions contained in the 1945 Constitution.

The 1945 Constitution was formulated by the BPUPKI (the Indonesian Independence Preparatory Efforts Investigation Agency). The design and formulation were later revised and determined by the PPKI (Preparatory Committee for Indonesian Independence) as the state constitution. If deemed necessary, the 1945 Constitution can be amended. The institution that has the authority to amend and determine the outcome is the MPR (People's Consultative Assembly).

b.  Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR Tap)

In the order of the statutory regulations, the decisions of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR Tap) can be said to have sunk in and out. Before Law no. 12/2011 applies, the order of the laws and regulations is regulated by Law no. 10 of 2004. According to Law no. 10/2004, in the order of laws in Indonesia there is no MPR Decree, whereas previously the MPR Decree was a high-ranking and strong regulation. After being abolished / deleted (based on Law No. 10/2004), the MPR Decree was re-emerged through Law no. 12/2011. MPR Decrees are regulations made by the MPR. This regulation is made to describe the provisions contained in the 1945 Constitution.

c.  Law (UU) / Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu)

Laws are regulations made by the DPR through a joint agreement with the president. The law is made as an elaboration of the 1945 Constitution or MPR Decree. Laws are made to follow up various provisions or to elaborate matters that have not been regulated in the 1945 Constitution or MPR Decree. Meanwhile, government regulations in lieu of laws (perpu) are regulations made and stipulated by the president in his position as head of state without the approval of the DPR. Government regulations in lieu of laws have an equal position with laws. The contents are also the same, namely following up on provisions or describing matters that have not been regulated in the 1945 Constitution.

Government regulations in lieu of laws are made, stipulated, and enforced in an emergency or critical situation that is urgent or compelling. Even if a president is made without the approval of the DPR, at a later time the government regulation in lieu of law must be approved by the DPR in the next trial. If the following trial does not get the approval of the DPR, a government regulation in lieu of law must be revoked and declared invalid.

d.  Government Regulation (PP)

Government regulations (PP) are regulations made and stipulated by the president in his position as head of government. Government regulations are made and stipulated to follow up or elaborate the provisions contained in law. In the technical language of legislation, it is stated that government regulations are made to implement laws.

e.  Presidential Regulation (Perpres)

Like government regulations, presidential regulations (perpres) are regulations made and stipulated by the president. However, in the order of statutory regulations, presidential regulations have a position under government regulations. Presidential regulations are made to elaborate the provisions contained in law or it can also be used to implement provisions contained in government regulations.

f.  Regional Regulation (Perda)

Regional regulations are regulations made by the DPRD (Regional People's Representative Council) with the approval of the regional head. Regional regulations are made and enforced to follow up on the implementation of regional autonomy or accommodate special conditions in the regions. Regional regulations can also be made to describe the contents of laws and regulations that are above it, such as laws, government regulations, and presidential regulations.

The formation of local regulations depends on the regional level. If made at the provincial level, regional regulations are made by the provincial DPRD in agreement with the governor. If drafted at the district level, regional regulations are made by the Kapubaten DPRD by agreement with the district head. If made at the city level, regional regulations are made by the municipal DPRD in agreement with the mayor.

2. Legal Institutional Structure

The legal institutional structure or structure is an important part of our national legal system. The structure of the legal institution in our country has changed from time to time in line with developments in various fields of life, especially in the field of law and politics. Changes in legal institutions in our country cannot be separated from the dynamics of people's lives.

The structure of the legal institution also determines the formation and administration of law. Judicial institutions, law enforcement officials, legal administration procedures, and legal administration supervision systems are part of the legal institutional structure whose existence and implementation determine the stability of the national legal system as a whole. These aspects are interrelated and mutually supportive in the legal system.

Efforts to strengthen the structure of legal institutions in Indonesia will continue to be carried out as part of reform and development in the legal sector. More specifically, these efforts were made, among others, to tidy up coordination between legal institutions and to avoid overlapping authority in handling legal problems that could result in legal uncertainty.

3.  Legal Materials

Legal material is related to the content or substance of the rule of law. Legal material is legal principles that are poured into a series of regulations, both in written and unwritten form. Any legal material that is translated into regulations stipulated by the state (through an authorized institution), is binding. All citizens must submit and obey it; in a sense, carry out the commands in it and leave its prohibitions.

Legal material greatly determines the establishment and stability of our national legal system. Its existence is a direct regulator of the attitudes and behavior of all elements of the nation and state. Through a firm, consistent, consistent and non-discriminatory implementation by the apparatus, legal material plays a very important role in creating order, security and justice.

Regarding legal material, since entering the reform era in 1998, our country has been very active in reforming the legal materials contained in various laws and regulations. Laws and regulations whose material contradicts the spirit of reform and efforts to uphold justice are revoked or renewed. On the other hand, new legislation with material that is reformative, non-discriminatory, non-repressive, and encourages the growth of freedom (that is responsible), equality, the spirit of healthy competition, community empowerment, and the creation of justice continues to be made and enforced.

4.  Legal Culture

Legal culture is related to legal awareness, attitude and behavior. These three things (awareness, attitudes, and legal behavior) reflect (whether or not embedded) legal culture. A society or nation is said to have a (good) legal culture if it has a strong habit of always being aware of the importance of the law and having a consistent attitude and behavior to obey the law.

Regarding the legal culture, it remains a crucial issue in our society and nation. In the midst of economic and social situations and conditions that have not fully recovered from the crisis, in general our society has yet to have a good legal culture. This happens not only among the lower classes of society, but also among officials, politicians, and even law enforcement officials themselves.

This is indicated by the fact that there are still many crimes in various forms with various actors, from the grassroots to high-ranking officials and law enforcement agencies. As for the many violations of the law, the resolution does not prioritize the principles of material truth and a sense of justice. The law enforcement is still very often done in a discriminatory way (in perspective). Many cases of lawlessness, such as corruption and abuse of office, with high-level perpetrators, take place without proper resolution, while minor law violations - for example, stealing a few pieces of chocolate and watermelon - are the perpetrators of the lower class, are processed according to the rules. and the perpetrators were actually punished.

This clearly contradicts the principle of justice, the principle that all people have the same position before the law, and the principle of getting equal treatment before the law (right of legal equality). More than that, these cases will seriously hinder efforts to enforce law and instill and strengthen legal culture in the life of society, nation and state. Obstruction of law enforcement efforts and cultivation of a legal culture will in turn make it very difficult to strengthen the overall legal system in our country.

The strengthening of the legal system will run less optimally without the support of law-abiding awareness, attitude and behavior. We hope that the problem of strengthening the legal culture is still a big job and a challenge for our nation. It really takes a very strong determination and willingness to have legal awareness and to behave and behave in compliance with the law through concrete practices in the daily life of society, nation and state.

Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia

 By  Akhmad Zamroni

Source: http://cdn2.tstatic.net

Judicial power is a very important part of the judicial system in general and in the case court process in particular. The administration of the judicial process is carried out through judicial powers. This implies that the authority to carry out legal proceedings is in the hands of the judges.

Then, through the media or what means is the judicial power to administer this trial? The exercise of judicial power to administer the judiciary is carried out through the media or means called judicial institutions. A judicial institution can be narrowly and practically referred to as an institution called a court, but in a broad and essential sense it also refers to other institutions that have authority related to judicial processes, such as the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court.

The emergence of the term "judicial power" in the judicial system is a form of recognition and transfer of authority by the state to judges to carry out judicial processes for various cases or legal cases that occur in the community. More concrete and more operational, conducting a judicial process in this case is "examining, hearing and deciding" cases based on applicable legal provisions and a sense of justice. Thus, it can be said that the judge is the main actor and motor in the judicial process. Judges are given the trust and authority by the state to administer the judiciary by examining, adjudicating and deciding cases in the context of upholding law and justice.

With his role as examiner, court and case decision maker, judges are given the freedom or freedom to exercise their power in handling cases. Therefore, the power of judges in handling cases is an independent power, namely free or independent. The independence of judicial power in our country is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution Article 24 Paragraph (1) which states that "Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice in order to uphold law and justice."

Judicial power must not be intervened and influenced by any power and power, including government power and public pressure (the public). In the judicial process, it is not permissible for anyone to interfere with, influence, and pressure judges in carrying out judicial duties either by means of opinions, threats, bribes, or others. In carrying out judicial duties, judges must be given full freedom to examine and judge and make decisions based purely on legal and justice considerations.

The principle of independence or freedom of judicial power is considered very basic, permanent, and inviolable. Thus the importance of this becomes an emphasis considering that the duties, responsibilities and authority of judges in carrying out the judicial process are directly related to the enforcement of law and justice. Interference and external influence on the implementation of the duties, functions, responsibilities and authority of judges in the judiciary can cause the judge's decision to not fulfill a sense of justice, which will result in injury and tarnish efforts to enforce law and justice itself.

The independence of judges in carrying out the duties, functions, responsibilities and powers of the judiciary is the key to the creation of a judicial institution and judicial processes that are reliable (credible) and capable of producing decisions that can fulfill a sense of justice. This is of course with a note that judges (must) have high integrity, be honest, professional, and competent in carrying out their duties, responsibilities and authorities. If all of these requirements are met, the judicial process and system can be relied upon to be able to achieve its goals in efforts to uphold law and justice.

Meanwhile, despite having independent authority, on the other hand, judges are also burdened with the responsibility to pay attention to and implement certain matters related to the judicial process. According to Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, in carrying out their duties and functions, judges are obliged to maintain the independence of the judiciary (Article 3 Paragraph [1]). According to the same law, judges, among others, are subject to the following provisions.

1.      Judges are obliged to explore, follow and understand the legal values ​​and the sense of justice that live in society.

2.      Judges must have integrity and personality beyond reproach, be honest, fair, professional and have experience in the field of law.

3.      Judges are required to comply with the code of ethics and code of conduct for judges.

4.      In considering the severity of the sentence, the judge is obliged to pay attention to the good and bad qualities of the defendant.

5.      In a deliberation session (between judges), each judge is obliged to convey a written consideration or opinion on the case being examined and become an integral part of the verdict.

6.      A judge is obliged to resign from the trial if he is bound by blood or similar ties to the third degree, or a husband or wife relationship even though he is divorced, with the chairman, one of the member judges, prosecutors, advocates, or clerks.

7.      The chairman of the panel or member judge is obliged to resign from the trial if he is bound by blood or similar ties to the third degree, or a husband or wife relationship even though they are divorced, with the party being tried or an advocate.

8.      A judge is obliged to resign from the trial if he has direct or indirect interest in the case being investigated, either on his own will or at the request of the party in court.